Enclips? Enclipse? You Probably Mean InClips Media

By Jonah, Founder of FindClout — August 2026

I run a competing clipping network, so read this with that in mind — but this page exists because I kept seeing the search terms "Enclips," "Enclips Media," and "Enclipse" show up with basically zero useful results attached to them, and I figured someone should actually answer the question instead of leaving it blank.

That mix-up makes sense — "InClips" is easy to mishear as "Enclips" over a phone call or a noisy Zoom, and "Enclipse" is a natural typo/mishearing of the whole thing sounding like "eclipse." Whichever spelling brought you here, this page gives you the condensed, source-checked profile: who InClips Media is, how their model works, what they publicly charge, who's on their client list, and — the part that matters most before you send a wire — what's actually verifiable about them versus what's just a marketing claim. For the long-form, line-by-line breakdown, see our full InClips Media review, the dedicated InClips Media pricing page, and the InClips Media alternatives comparison. This page is the router; those are the deep dives.

Who InClips Media Actually Is

InClips Media is a clipping network founded by Avry Townsend (CEO/Co-Founder) and Eric Duwel (Founder/CMO), based in Tampa, Florida, with roughly 8 employees according to RocketReach. Their domain, inclipsmedia.com, was registered July 26, 2024 — meaning the public-facing brand is relatively young — and WHOIS ownership is privacy-hidden. ScamAdviser's automated check flags the young domain age and hidden ownership as factors it weighs, alongside relatively low measured traffic, but still rates the site "very likely safe" overall. That's a mixed signal worth knowing about, not a red flag on its own; plenty of legitimate B2B operations run privacy-protected WHOIS and modest public traffic.

On social, InClips Media runs @inclipsmedia on Instagram with around 3,058 followers, and has a Whop storefront profile that shows a January 2025 join date with its "created businesses" count hidden. Their own marketing language leans hard into the "engineered virality" framing: taglines include "Making You Viral One Clip At A Time," a description of the model as "engineered virality, not luck or traditional PR," and a pitch built around "dominating algorithms instead of buying ads." They describe themselves as a "high performance media network with a committed CPM floor model and no unnecessary lock-in."

The Model: Mass Distribution Through Owned and Partner Accounts

InClips Media's own site describes its distribution approach as mass, organic distribution of a brand's clips across TikTok, Instagram Reels, and X, using a combination of owned and partner accounts — "dozens to hundreds of accounts," with the algorithm left to surface the winning posts. They pitch this as delivering "Tier-1 reach, efficient blended CPMs, transparent performance tracking via proprietary software." On the creator-vetting side, a search-engine snippet of their own copy states that talent is filtered on "view velocity, geo data, reliability, and brand fit" — though the specific thresholds behind any of those four criteria aren't published anywhere we could find.

There's one number worth flagging carefully because of where it came from. A LinkedIn post by Michael Stafford of ARC Sports Marketing — a partner, posting on his own account, not InClips Media's — claims the network drove "100 billion views and 4 billion engagements across 750-800k unique posts at a blended CPM of just $0.20" over six months, adding "No AI. No bots." That's a striking number. It's also unaudited, doesn't appear on InClips Media's own site, and comes with zero published methodology for how views, engagement, or the "no bots" determination were measured. We're citing it because it's the specific volume claim circulating around this brand and you deserve to see it — not because it's independently verified.

Client Roster

InClips Media's own site names several clients in its case studies: Polymarket, BetOnline, Triumph, CrownCoins, SuperGroup (Ace.com / Jackpot City), Roobet, and Razed. That list skews heavily toward gambling, prediction markets, and sweepstakes casino brands — a category where high-volume clipping distribution is a well-established acquisition channel. The case studies themselves use soft, rounded language like "hundreds of millions of views" rather than exact, sourced figures, and the view counters visible on their homepage are rendered in an obscured format rather than as plain numbers. No total network size — creator count, account count, anything — is published anywhere on their properties.

Pricing: What's Publicly Indexed

InClips Media doesn't put pricing directly on their main site — it lives on a separate page, lowcpms.com, titled "Partnership Rates," which blocks direct fetches but has been indexed by Google in snippet form. Based on those snippets, the structure is a slider: monthly spend commitment determines a guaranteed view volume, a maximum CPM ceiling, and an annual contract value. The tiers as indexed:

Per the indexed copy, clients "choose a monthly minimum that reserves their inventory tier and locks their maximum CPM," terms are rolling month-to-month, and InClips Media replies to inquiries "within 24 hours." What's not published anywhere: the actual dollar minimum required to unlock each tier. If you want the exact minimums, you'll need to ask them directly — we're not going to guess at a number they haven't disclosed. Our InClips Media pricing deep-dive walks through what those numbers likely mean in practice and how they stack against the rest of the category.

One useful comparison point: other named players in this category — Lumina, ClipAffiliates, LuvKaizen — publish CPMs in the $1–$5 range on their own marketing. InClips Media's $0.06–$0.25 range sits far below that category benchmark, with no published explanation of what makes those views cheaper to deliver.

The Clipper Supply Side

InClips Media recruits creators through at least two public Whop storefronts. "Paid In Clips" shows 14,700 members joined and a 4.8-star rating across 58 ratings, but publishes no visible payout rates, follower requirements, or payout method, and its content feed appeared empty at time of research. A second storefront, "Crypto Clipping" (also listed as "Crypto InClips"), pitches something closer to watermark rental — "post your normal content, and get paid for having a watermarked logo attached" — and runs an invite/waitlist model with only 84 members. That one carries two 1-star ratings with hidden review text, which is worth knowing about even though two data points don't establish a pattern.

Neither storefront publishes follower minimums, geographic eligibility requirements, payout rates, or payout methods for clippers. The visible reviewer names on the public Whop pages skew non-US, which is a soft signal worth being aware of — but we're not going to overstate it into a claim about where their creator base is actually located, because that's not something InClips Media publishes either way. What is worth noting is the category context: a Forbes piece from April 2026 (which does not mention InClips Media by name, and is describing the clipping category broadly) reports that clipper labor in this space concentrates in the Philippines, Serbia, and India, at rates of roughly $300–$1,500 per million views.

What's Verifiable, and What Isn't

This is the part that actually matters if you're comparison-shopping. Here's the honest split:

• Verifiable / publicly sourced: the company's founders, location, employee count estimate, domain registration date, indexed pricing tiers, named client list, and Whop storefront member counts and ratings.
• Not published anywhere: a bot-detection or view-verification methodology, per-creator geographic reporting, network size (creator or account count), exact tier minimums in dollars, and any independent brand-side review — there's no Trustpilot page for InClips Media (it 404s), and no Reddit threads or X posts alleging payment or bot issues turned up in research either.

Put plainly: there's no evidence InClips Media is a scam, and there's also no independent evidence confirming the volume or quality of what they deliver. At CPMs as low as $0.06–$0.19, the natural question is what mechanism explains a real cost that far below the category's published range — and that mechanism isn't disclosed anywhere in InClips Media's public marketing. That's the gap. Not an accusation, a gap. If you're evaluating them, ask directly for a sample bot-detection report and a per-creator geographic breakdown before you commit spend, and see how specific the answer is.

The Comparison Shopper's Next Step

If you landed on "Enclips" while shopping clipping vendors, you're probably weighing price against risk — the same tradeoff every brand in this category faces. Here's the thing worth internalizing before you pick anyone: the cheapest quoted CPM is rarely the cheapest real cost. A rock-bottom CPM on unverified, unfiltered traffic can cost more per real American viewer than a higher-quoted CPM on audiences that are actually verified — because a meaningful share of the cheap traffic may not be real, US-based, or Tier-1 at all, and there's no way to check without a published verification mechanism.

That's the whole reason FindClout runs the model it does. We've generated 3.3B+ views and sold 500M+ verified views to 30+ brands — including Polymarket, Novig, Wagr, Mindgrasp, Venice, Undetectable AI, and Favorited — across roughly 3,000 vetted, curated faceless meme pages (not an open sign-up marketplace). Every post gets scored by multi-layer, in-house bot detection before it counts toward your campaign, and you get a per-creator demographic export — US %, Tier-1 %, even city-level — before you commit a dollar of budget, not after. On a general logo/watermark campaign we quote a $0.20 max CPM ceiling and typically deliver around half that, with effective CPMs landing in the ~$0.08–$0.10 range once a campaign runs its course — over-delivery against the committed goal is the norm, not the exception. That's the same price shape as the discount end of this category's published ceilings. The difference isn't the number on the rate card; it's that every view behind our number is bot-scored and demographically verified, and you can see the proof before you spend. Niche or regulated verticals like gambling price differently — for those, ask us for a written quote, typically back within 24 hours.

If you want the full head-to-head on InClips Media specifically — a longer breakdown of their model, pros, cons, and where FindClout and other named vendors fit better or worse for different use cases — go read the complete InClips Media review. For a deeper cut on pricing math, see the InClips Media pricing guide. And if InClips Media specifically isn't the right fit for your brand, the InClips Media alternatives page walks through several other named vendors, including where each one wins.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is "Enclips" the same as InClips Media?

Almost certainly yes. There is no clipping company named "Enclips" or "Enclipse" — those are the two most common misspellings of InClips Media (inclipsmedia.com), a Tampa, FL-based clipping network. Note that inclips.com is a separate, unrelated coupon site with no connection to InClips Media.

What is InClips Media?

InClips Media is a clipping network founded by Avry Townsend (CEO/Co-Founder) and Eric Duwel (Founder/CMO), based in Tampa, FL, with roughly 8 employees per RocketReach. Its stated model is mass, organic distribution of a brand's clips across TikTok, Instagram Reels, and X using a mix of owned and partner accounts, with talent vetted on view velocity, geo data, reliability, and brand fit.

How much does InClips Media cost?

Based on Google-indexed snippets of their rate page (lowcpms.com), InClips Media runs tiered CPM-ceiling pricing: a $0.25 max CPM tier with a 12.5% management fee, a $0.225 max CPM tier at 10%, and a $0.20 max CPM tier at 7.5%, plus a $750K+/month fully custom tier. Exact dollar minimums per tier are not published anywhere. See our full pricing breakdown.

Who are InClips Media's clients?

Case studies on their own site name Polymarket, BetOnline, Triumph, CrownCoins, SuperGroup (Ace.com / Jackpot City), Roobet, and Razed — a roster weighted heavily toward gambling and sweepstakes casino brands.

Does InClips Media verify US audiences or filter bots?

There's no published methodology for bot filtering, view verification, or per-creator geographic reporting anywhere on InClips Media's public properties. They advertise "Tier-1 reach" and "transparent performance tracking" but don't publish what that tracking actually checks or shows clients before spend.

Is InClips Media legit?

There's no public evidence of fraud or non-payment — no Trustpilot page exists, and no Reddit threads or X posts alleging bot views or payment issues turned up in research. That also means there's no independent review record to check either way, so treat the absence as a reason to ask direct questions before spending, not as a verdict.

What's a good alternative to InClips Media?

If you want the same low-CPM pricing shape but with published, per-creator verification behind every view, FindClout runs a $0.20 CPM ceiling on general logo campaigns (delivering an effective ~$0.08–$0.10 CPM in practice) with multi-layer bot detection and a demographic export you see before you commit budget. See our full alternatives comparison for more options.

Is "Enclipse" a real clipping company?

No — there's no clipping company operating under the name "Enclipse." It's a mishearing of InClips Media, the same way "Enclips" is. Both searches lead to the same company at inclipsmedia.com.

Jonah is the founder of FindClout, a curated creator distribution network that has generated 3.3B+ views for brands across sports, prediction markets, AI, and more. Reach him at [email protected] or book a call.